Current:Home > BackPanel of judges says a First Amendment challenge to Maryland’s digital ad tax should be considered-InfoLens
Panel of judges says a First Amendment challenge to Maryland’s digital ad tax should be considered
View Date:2024-12-23 17:00:55
ANNAPOLIS, Md. (AP) — A federal appeals court directed a lower federal court on Wednesday to consider the merits of a challenge to Maryland’s first-in-the-nation digital advertising tax on First Amendment grounds, while agreeing that three other challenges should be dismissed.
It’s a law that attorneys for Big Tech have contended unfairly targets companies like Facebook, Google and Amazon. The legal case is being closely watched by other states that have also weighed a similar tax for online ads.
The three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed with a lower federal court’s decision to dismiss the challenge on First Amendment grounds argued by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, as well as three other trade associations.
The Maryland law, which taxes companies like Facebook and Google for money they make from digital ads on the internet, prohibits the companies from passing along costs to customers who buy ads. But plaintiffs contended that passing along the costs violated the First Amendment.
“The district court in the first instance should decide whether the pass-through provision restrains speech and, if so, whether it passes constitutional muster,” the appeals court said in its decision.
The appeals court agreed with the lower court’s decision to dismiss three other challenges that were brought under the Internet Tax Freedom Act, the Commerce Clause and the Due Process Clause.
The federal district court in Maryland dismissed those three counts as prohibited by the Tax Injunction Act, which prevents federal courts from enjoining the collection of state taxes when state law provides an adequate remedy. The three-judge panel vacated the lower federal court’s judgement to dismiss the three challenges with prejudice, instructing the court to dismiss without prejudice.
The court had dismissed the First Amendment challenge on mootness grounds, after a state trial court declared the tax unconstitutional in a separate proceeding. However, the Maryland Supreme Court later vacated that judgement.
Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown said in a statement Wednesday that he will continue “to defend this transformative legislation and still believe in the validity of this law.”
“The purpose of the digital ad tax is to provide critical funding to improve Maryland’s public education system and prepare our students to compete in the global marketplace,” Brown said.
Maryland lawmakers overrode then-Gov. Larry Hogan’s veto of the digital ad tax measure to pass the legislation in 2021. The state estimated the tax could raise about $250 million a year to help pay for a sweeping K-12 education measure.
The law taxes revenue that the affected companies make on digital advertisements shown in Maryland.
Attorneys for Big Tech companies have contended that the law unfairly targets them. It would impose a tax based on global annual gross revenues for companies that make more than $100 million globally. Supporters have described it as a necessary step to overhaul the state’s tax methods in response to significant changes in how businesses advertise.
veryGood! (21977)
Related
- Why have wildfires been erupting across the East Coast this fall?
- 2024 Olympics: Gymnast Laurie Hernandez Claps Back at Criticism of Her Paris Commentary
- Inmate advocates describe suffocating heat in Texas prisons as they plea for air conditioning
- Haunting Secrets About The Blair Witch Project: Hungry Actors, Nauseous Audiences & Those Rocks
- Businesses at struggling corner where George Floyd was killed sue Minneapolis
- Growing number of Maui residents are 'barely surviving,' new report finds
- Kentucky judge dismisses lawsuit challenging a new law to restrict the sale of vaping products
- Team USA Olympic athletes are able to mimic home at their own training facility in France
- Mike Tyson is expected to honor late daughter during Jake Paul fight. Here's how.
- 2024 Olympics: Gymnast Laurie Hernandez Claps Back at Criticism of Her Paris Commentary
Ranking
- Congress is revisiting UFOs: Here's what's happened since last hearing on extraterrestrials
- Jason Kelce’s appearance ‘super cool’ for Olympic underdog USA field hockey team
- Look: Snoop Dogg enters pool with Michael Phelps at 2024 Paris Olympics on NBC
- Olympic gymnastics live updates: Simone Biles, USA win gold medal in team final
- How many dog breeds are there? A guide to groups recognized in the US
- Christina Applegate opens up about the 'only plastic surgery I’ve ever had'
- Olympics bet against climate change with swimming in Seine and may lose. Scientists say told you so
- Georgia’s largest school district won’t teach Black studies course without state approval
Recommendation
-
Kansas basketball vs Michigan State live score updates, highlights, how to watch Champions Classic
-
Police union will not fight the firing of sheriff's deputy who fatally shot Sonya Massey
-
South Sudan men's basketball beats odds to inspire at Olympics
-
Matt Damon Details Surreal Experience of Daughter Isabella Heading off to College
-
Who's hosting 'SNL' tonight? Musical guest, start time, where to watch Nov. 9 episode
-
NYC Mayor Eric Adams defends top advisor accused of sexual harassment
-
Severe storms in the Southeast US leave 1 dead and cause widespread power outages
-
Golf Olympics schedule: When Nelly Korda, Scottie Scheffler tee off at Paris Games